When liberals said global warming causes crime, no one knew it was because they planned on prosecuting their opponents! Late last week, climate alarmist Lawrence Torcello didn't do his movement any favors when he lobbied for jailing global warming skeptics (which, after yesterday's storm, might have included the entire city of Washington). It was a new low for an environmental movement that is already God's gift to late-night comedy.
Torcello, a professor at New York's Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), tested the idea in an essay for "The Conversation," (an ironic name, since that's exactly what the Left is hoping to end). In particular, the professor takes aim at conservative groups trying to raise awareness about what the science really says about the manufactured crisis of global warming. "Consider cases in which science communication is intentionally undermined for political and financial gain," Torcello writes. "I submit that this is just what is happening with the current, well-documented funding of global warming denialism... We have good reason to consider the funding of climate denial to be criminally and morally negligent. The charge of criminal and moral negligence ought to extend to all activities of the climate deniers who receive funding as part of a sustained campaign to undermine the public's understanding of scientific consensus."
Setting aside the criminal aspect, who are liberals to talk about the funding of a "sustained campaign to undermine the public's understanding" of science? They don't call it the "green" movement for nothing! Radical environmentalists have funneled billions of dollars into a global fact-twisting mission to drown out the truth. Torcello's hypocrisy, though, is just a footnote to the bigger outrage -- which is the idea that disbelief with liberals is grounds for imprisonment. Unfortunately for Torcello, there's no jail big enough to hold the millions of Americans unconvinced by the Left's "science."
More at:
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
Monday, February 3, 2014
The Worst Republican Senator
Lindsey Graham's sorry record.
South Carolina's Lindsey Graham is a flop. He pretends to be a conservative, but sells out conservatives and insults them while doing so. He pretends to be effective at reaching across party lines, but the only thing he effectively does is help the other party. He inhabits the Senate seat of Strom Thurmond, legendary for great attention to his South Carolina constituents, but Graham spends most of his time trailing behind John McCain like a valet as McCain criss-crosses the country in pursuit of the presidency. He called Ted Kennedy "one of the most principled men I've ever met." In sum, in the words of conservative movement stalwart Richard Viguerie, "Lindsey Graham is part of the problem."
What, for example, could possibly have possessed Graham, in April of 2006, to write an essay for Time magazine about the virtues of Hillary Clinton? He called her "a smart, prepared, serious senator." She is "sought out by her colleagues to form legislative partnerships." She has managed to "build unusual political alliances with...conservatives."
He praises liberals, but reserves particular venom for conservatives who disagree with him. The most infamous example came at a speech to the utterly radical Hispanic group La Raza -- it was bad enough that he spoke to them, much less what he said -- when he described what he would do to opponents of the awful immigration proposal he helped Ted Kennedy craft: "We're going to tell the bigots to shut up." The idea that only a bigot could oppose the Kennedy amnesty plan was a recurring theme with Graham: On This Week, he told George Stephanopoulos that opponents were like those in earlier years who put up signs that said "No Catholics, no Jews, no Irish need apply."
MEANWHILE, GRAHAM deserves every bit of abuse conservatives can heap on him for his record on judicial nominees, which swings back and forth between pathetically ineffective and absolutely counterproductive. Of his leading role in the "Gang of 14," which saved the Democrats' unprecedented option of filibustering President Bush's nominees, Graham clearly thought his gesture of goodwill would win him some chits with Democrats. Think again. Right now his home circuit, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, suffers from the most serious official "judicial emergency" in the country, with only 10 of the 15 seats filled.
More at:
South Carolina's Lindsey Graham is a flop. He pretends to be a conservative, but sells out conservatives and insults them while doing so. He pretends to be effective at reaching across party lines, but the only thing he effectively does is help the other party. He inhabits the Senate seat of Strom Thurmond, legendary for great attention to his South Carolina constituents, but Graham spends most of his time trailing behind John McCain like a valet as McCain criss-crosses the country in pursuit of the presidency. He called Ted Kennedy "one of the most principled men I've ever met." In sum, in the words of conservative movement stalwart Richard Viguerie, "Lindsey Graham is part of the problem."
What, for example, could possibly have possessed Graham, in April of 2006, to write an essay for Time magazine about the virtues of Hillary Clinton? He called her "a smart, prepared, serious senator." She is "sought out by her colleagues to form legislative partnerships." She has managed to "build unusual political alliances with...conservatives."
He praises liberals, but reserves particular venom for conservatives who disagree with him. The most infamous example came at a speech to the utterly radical Hispanic group La Raza -- it was bad enough that he spoke to them, much less what he said -- when he described what he would do to opponents of the awful immigration proposal he helped Ted Kennedy craft: "We're going to tell the bigots to shut up." The idea that only a bigot could oppose the Kennedy amnesty plan was a recurring theme with Graham: On This Week, he told George Stephanopoulos that opponents were like those in earlier years who put up signs that said "No Catholics, no Jews, no Irish need apply."
MEANWHILE, GRAHAM deserves every bit of abuse conservatives can heap on him for his record on judicial nominees, which swings back and forth between pathetically ineffective and absolutely counterproductive. Of his leading role in the "Gang of 14," which saved the Democrats' unprecedented option of filibustering President Bush's nominees, Graham clearly thought his gesture of goodwill would win him some chits with Democrats. Think again. Right now his home circuit, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, suffers from the most serious official "judicial emergency" in the country, with only 10 of the 15 seats filled.
More at:
Thursday, January 23, 2014
The GOP’s Losing Strategy
No group knows better how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory than the Republican establishment. But this election cycle it seems they want to establish their losing strategy early so as to avoid any late-season drama.
Last Presidential cycle, the GOP ensured its defeat by abandoning conservatives. It followed its old script of nominating a milquetoast, faux-conservative warmonger in Mitt Romney, who was campaigning on attacking Iran and Syria and growing government. If that weren’t enough, it engaged in dirty tricks during the primary to defeat Ron Paul, the only conservative in the race.
The GOP’s actions during the primaries discouraged Paul supporters — composed of a mostly younger crowd just cutting their teeth in politics, civil libertarians and doves of a more leftist bent — from participating in an obviously rigged system. And if that weren’t enough to turn off the Paul supporters, the elites humiliated them on the convention floor in Tampa, Fla. Then, when Romney fell short on election night to a Barack Obama who received 3.6 million few votes than he did in 2008, the GOP establishment blamed Paul supporters and the conservative Tea Party for not turning out.
Since then, rather than court them, the GOP has done nothing but antagonize conservatives, libertarians and Tea Party adherents. Establishment Republicans have spit in the faces of rank-and-file conservatives. The establishment has ridiculed and slandered those on the right who have advocated for smaller government, an end to wars, defunding Obamacare, an end to drone attacks, the repeal of National Defense Authorization Act unlawful detention and the Patriot Act, and the cessation of National Security Agency spying. Among the invectives they’ve used: whacko birds, crazy, unpatriotic, ridiculous and bullies who need their noses punched.
Establishment Republicans abandoned Senator Rand Paul during his filibuster over drone attacks in the United States. As evidenced by the popular reaction Paul received both from people who traditionally vote Republican and the Ron Paul crowd who tend to vote libertarian if they vote at all, the elites were on the wrong side of the debate.
More at:
Last Presidential cycle, the GOP ensured its defeat by abandoning conservatives. It followed its old script of nominating a milquetoast, faux-conservative warmonger in Mitt Romney, who was campaigning on attacking Iran and Syria and growing government. If that weren’t enough, it engaged in dirty tricks during the primary to defeat Ron Paul, the only conservative in the race.
The GOP’s actions during the primaries discouraged Paul supporters — composed of a mostly younger crowd just cutting their teeth in politics, civil libertarians and doves of a more leftist bent — from participating in an obviously rigged system. And if that weren’t enough to turn off the Paul supporters, the elites humiliated them on the convention floor in Tampa, Fla. Then, when Romney fell short on election night to a Barack Obama who received 3.6 million few votes than he did in 2008, the GOP establishment blamed Paul supporters and the conservative Tea Party for not turning out.
Since then, rather than court them, the GOP has done nothing but antagonize conservatives, libertarians and Tea Party adherents. Establishment Republicans have spit in the faces of rank-and-file conservatives. The establishment has ridiculed and slandered those on the right who have advocated for smaller government, an end to wars, defunding Obamacare, an end to drone attacks, the repeal of National Defense Authorization Act unlawful detention and the Patriot Act, and the cessation of National Security Agency spying. Among the invectives they’ve used: whacko birds, crazy, unpatriotic, ridiculous and bullies who need their noses punched.
Establishment Republicans abandoned Senator Rand Paul during his filibuster over drone attacks in the United States. As evidenced by the popular reaction Paul received both from people who traditionally vote Republican and the Ron Paul crowd who tend to vote libertarian if they vote at all, the elites were on the wrong side of the debate.
More at:
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Total Surrender
The budget agreement announced yesterday increases spending, raises
taxes, and funds Obamacare for two years. It has the support of
President Obama, Harry Reid, and countless Democrats in Washington.
What is Mitch McConnell doing to stop it? Nothing. In fact, McConnell was completely silent on the deal yesterday.
Mitch McConnell may vote against the deal so he can pretend to be a conservative, but don't be fooled. He wants the deal to pass. He made it clear that he won't fight the Democrats on spending and he forced his party to surrender.
It's so disappointing because now is the perfect time for Republicans to take a stand against Obamacare. The law is very unpopular and Democrats are running for cover. In fact, Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) just started a new TV ad distancing herself from Obamacare.
Thanks to your willingness to fight this terrible law, we're winning the debate. But the law isn't going to repeal itself. That will only happen if Republicans take a principled and courageous stand to stop it.
More at:
http://youtu.be/UNVPxCO1Hdg
What is Mitch McConnell doing to stop it? Nothing. In fact, McConnell was completely silent on the deal yesterday.
Mitch McConnell may vote against the deal so he can pretend to be a conservative, but don't be fooled. He wants the deal to pass. He made it clear that he won't fight the Democrats on spending and he forced his party to surrender.
It's so disappointing because now is the perfect time for Republicans to take a stand against Obamacare. The law is very unpopular and Democrats are running for cover. In fact, Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) just started a new TV ad distancing herself from Obamacare.
Thanks to your willingness to fight this terrible law, we're winning the debate. But the law isn't going to repeal itself. That will only happen if Republicans take a principled and courageous stand to stop it.
More at:
http://youtu.be/UNVPxCO1Hdg
Saturday, December 7, 2013
Farm Bill Negotiators Pushing Passage Before The End Of The Year
Will a farm bill be pushed through before the end of the year? Some lawmakers are working to make that a reality, but that accomplishment will not be favorable for taxpayers and consumers.
Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX) told reporters Monday, “There’s no reason not to get [a farm bill]. Every day we don’t get something done makes it more and more difficult.” Rep. Conaway would like to see a farm bill passed before the end of the year.
CQ reports (sub. req’d) The principal farm bill conferees Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK), Rep. Collin Peterson (D-MN), Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), andSen. Thad Cochran (R-MS) are meeting this Wednesday to prepare for some kind of agreement between the House and Senate.
A Trillion Reasons Not to Pass the Farm Bill
But the truth is there’s a trillion reasons not to pass a farm bill hastily! The House and Senate bills would cost taxpayers nearly a trillion dollars.
The Wall Street Journal recently reported (sub. req’d) on the conservative perspective:
Some conservatives… say that lawmakers will be rewarded if they reject a farm bill that spends too much money or ends up resembling “corporate welfare” for farmers. “It’s an opportunity for them to say Washington is not in the business of handing things out to people,” said Dan Holler, spokesman for Heritage Action for America, the lobbying arm of the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.
More at:
Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX) told reporters Monday, “There’s no reason not to get [a farm bill]. Every day we don’t get something done makes it more and more difficult.” Rep. Conaway would like to see a farm bill passed before the end of the year.
CQ reports (sub. req’d) The principal farm bill conferees Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK), Rep. Collin Peterson (D-MN), Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), andSen. Thad Cochran (R-MS) are meeting this Wednesday to prepare for some kind of agreement between the House and Senate.
A Trillion Reasons Not to Pass the Farm Bill
But the truth is there’s a trillion reasons not to pass a farm bill hastily! The House and Senate bills would cost taxpayers nearly a trillion dollars.
The Wall Street Journal recently reported (sub. req’d) on the conservative perspective:
Some conservatives… say that lawmakers will be rewarded if they reject a farm bill that spends too much money or ends up resembling “corporate welfare” for farmers. “It’s an opportunity for them to say Washington is not in the business of handing things out to people,” said Dan Holler, spokesman for Heritage Action for America, the lobbying arm of the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.
More at:
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
The Right Fix For America: Grass-Roots – The Power Of The People
By Chuck Collins October 16, 2013
Conservatives for Responsible Government PAC, Inc.
511 1st Ave S, North Myrtle Beach, SC 29582
In the 2014 elections, we must unmask our national politician’s best-kept secret: that what they see as the be-all and end-all of modern governance, the states, are fast becoming an obsolete political structure.
In the United States, for the first time in many decades, a new generation is coming of age with a lower standard of living than their parents’. They are faced with a choice: continued loss of personal freedoms and a prolonged drift into irrelevance or they can stand up and face the issues head on.
The time is ripe for a national, generational, non-partisan, grass-roots movement to take back our country and our way of life. And before forming a new political party, we should look to the success stories of the many states where there have been numerous advances in the areas of education, health care, flexible employment, border security, gender equality and much, much more, to determine what our national platform might be. We then can bring these solutions to the other states to look critically at these successes to see if they are applicable to their needs.
At times, we conservatives will differ on many issues. These differences should not cause us to splinter into fighting factions trying to get to the same result; they should cause us to pause and come to agreement on the basic issues of where we as a country want to go in the future. We will agree on about 80% or more of the issues facing us. The other 20% can be implemented in the states and allowed to bubble up to the national level at the right time with more robust solutions from which we can choose.
Also, we cannot continue to sacrifice good, solid conservatives because of one perceived mistake in voting. If we continue to do this then we will have no real conservative leadership; we’ll only have the moderates who want to compromise our values away. All of us must remember that only one man has ever lived in this world that did not make a mistake or commit a sin. We must share with these leaders our frustrations and really support those with a strong conservative service record of supporting us.
We can take our country back to its founding roots where we can experience the freedoms of our ancestors. Many of us do not know what has been lost and need to examine our current political environment and direction to see if we are willing to give up any more of our remaining freedoms.
It is not that our elected leaders are malevolent or incapable of facing this challenge. They simply are not wired to understand the reality of today’s political landscape. It has changed considerably over the last 7 to 12 years. It is naive to expect traditional politicians who have been repeatedly elected for many terms to adequately address issues like resource scarcity, chronic under- or unemployment, border security, educational initiatives that are not working, oil independence, among other global issues that will take decades to resolve at our current stalemated pace.
Today’s solutions need to be grounded in the 50 laboratories (the individual states) that have the flexibility and the will to responsibly meet the needs of their citizens, or they won’t be real solutions at all and those local politicians won’t remain in office. The goods and services that have been provided at the federal level are mediocre, at best, if they work at all!
We cannot afford to continue to be fooled by our leaders’ self-aggrandizing delusion that, in terms of policy making, the federal state is the appropriate vehicle for our times. Our national politicians do not even read the bills they are passing. Nor do they approve the regulations that the non-elected bureaucrats write and implement as laws that we must follow. Our federal representatives have abdicated their primary responsibility which is to represent the people of this great country.
Instead, we must fully embrace what many of us already sense – that we stand at the mid-day of a progressive era in which Americans have a choice to continue to embrace or outright reject. If we continue to embrace the centralization of power at the federal level, we will continue down the path of dependency leading to a laggardly people and, I dare say, within 10 years we will not recognize our country. Or we can stop this madness and embrace the original path of state’s rights with a small federal government and return the United States of America to its rightful place as a national leader on the world stage letting the individual states govern their people.
If we don’t, America risks becoming a stereotype of Europe: a place with good hospitals and millions of people without adequate medical care in a timely manner, lacking in technological leadership in many areas, and many people, at times, with limited access to world-class universities, and generations held back because of parochial worldviews.
We are, strangely, the first generation of citizens that doubt our own political project. A republic that is unique in the world and that still draws people from every country in the world to our shores. Our country still offers anyone, regardless of class or ethnicity, the opportunity to freely succeed in any entrepreneurial endeavor without governmental interference. It is the exceptionalism of the American people that is unique to the world that draws these people to our borders. We will lose this freedom in this generation if we do not stand up now!
There is an old Jewish saying, “If you have only two choices, then choose the third.” The point is not to replace America’s “go along to get along” style of leadership with a dictatorship of the young. The point is to focus this movement – it must be carried by all those who, regardless of their age, agree that we must shift more power to the rising youth as citizen-legislators so we can successfully reduce the debt and governmental burdens with which we are saddling our future generations.
These younger Americans have grown up in austerity, having to cut budgets and who are digital natives. Unlike our leaders today, they are well adapted to an increasingly rapid pace of change, and their instinct is to use the most innovative and cost-effective methods to achieve the goals of the American people.
In America, politics has become much too about individual personalities, careers and partisanship, and too little about what produces tangible results. Rather than bickering over whose federal policies are preferable, we need an “American” effort to determine our best practices in every field and adopt them principally to external objects, such as war, peace, negotiation and foreign commerce with taxation restricted to only these. Thus, in limiting the reach of the federal government into every citizen’s life, restores the liberties and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the state.
From the 50 laboratories mentioned earlier, we can determine, on a national level, which models offer the experience of which tested improvements to the human condition are successful, scalable and applicable to the national population. We have never allowed this to happen in our country’s existence. One recent idea, health care at a state level, was thought to be applicable at the national level without looking at its successes or failures, and without looking at whether the idea was scalable to the national level. We currently have an unworkable health care program that was never carefully thought out or debated to see which features were applicable or affordable. The rules are still being written and no one knows where our health care rules and regulations are going to take us. There is no accountability for these rules and regulations.
America will not be changed by the elections of 2014. It will only change when freedom-minded politicians who are elected to the federal legislature agree to transfer many of the powers the federal government has usurped back to the states, where they rightfully belong.
We need our politicians to know that we no longer buy their federal bluff, that we don’t share their fear of ‘we, the people don’t know what we’re doing.’ If we continue moving more toward the federal state, our current state legislatures and elected officials become irrelevant.
Either we harness the power of our people and our resources and change the direction of our political landscape to restore the greatest form of government the world has ever seen, or we let the pace of world government (United Nations) overtake our laws and rights leaving us without any right of self-government or personal rights or the right to own property.
The first step is to start voting not as Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Libertarians, Green Party, or whatever other political flavor of the day, but voting as “Americans” for our freedoms, our rights to own property, to choose our profession, to choose where we live, and to choose with whom we fellowship.
As one of my favorite commentator’s used to say, Wake Up America!
Conservatives for Responsible Government PAC, Inc.
511 1st Ave S, North Myrtle Beach, SC 29582
In the 2014 elections, we must unmask our national politician’s best-kept secret: that what they see as the be-all and end-all of modern governance, the states, are fast becoming an obsolete political structure.
In the United States, for the first time in many decades, a new generation is coming of age with a lower standard of living than their parents’. They are faced with a choice: continued loss of personal freedoms and a prolonged drift into irrelevance or they can stand up and face the issues head on.
The time is ripe for a national, generational, non-partisan, grass-roots movement to take back our country and our way of life. And before forming a new political party, we should look to the success stories of the many states where there have been numerous advances in the areas of education, health care, flexible employment, border security, gender equality and much, much more, to determine what our national platform might be. We then can bring these solutions to the other states to look critically at these successes to see if they are applicable to their needs.
At times, we conservatives will differ on many issues. These differences should not cause us to splinter into fighting factions trying to get to the same result; they should cause us to pause and come to agreement on the basic issues of where we as a country want to go in the future. We will agree on about 80% or more of the issues facing us. The other 20% can be implemented in the states and allowed to bubble up to the national level at the right time with more robust solutions from which we can choose.
Also, we cannot continue to sacrifice good, solid conservatives because of one perceived mistake in voting. If we continue to do this then we will have no real conservative leadership; we’ll only have the moderates who want to compromise our values away. All of us must remember that only one man has ever lived in this world that did not make a mistake or commit a sin. We must share with these leaders our frustrations and really support those with a strong conservative service record of supporting us.
We can take our country back to its founding roots where we can experience the freedoms of our ancestors. Many of us do not know what has been lost and need to examine our current political environment and direction to see if we are willing to give up any more of our remaining freedoms.
It is not that our elected leaders are malevolent or incapable of facing this challenge. They simply are not wired to understand the reality of today’s political landscape. It has changed considerably over the last 7 to 12 years. It is naive to expect traditional politicians who have been repeatedly elected for many terms to adequately address issues like resource scarcity, chronic under- or unemployment, border security, educational initiatives that are not working, oil independence, among other global issues that will take decades to resolve at our current stalemated pace.
Today’s solutions need to be grounded in the 50 laboratories (the individual states) that have the flexibility and the will to responsibly meet the needs of their citizens, or they won’t be real solutions at all and those local politicians won’t remain in office. The goods and services that have been provided at the federal level are mediocre, at best, if they work at all!
We cannot afford to continue to be fooled by our leaders’ self-aggrandizing delusion that, in terms of policy making, the federal state is the appropriate vehicle for our times. Our national politicians do not even read the bills they are passing. Nor do they approve the regulations that the non-elected bureaucrats write and implement as laws that we must follow. Our federal representatives have abdicated their primary responsibility which is to represent the people of this great country.
Instead, we must fully embrace what many of us already sense – that we stand at the mid-day of a progressive era in which Americans have a choice to continue to embrace or outright reject. If we continue to embrace the centralization of power at the federal level, we will continue down the path of dependency leading to a laggardly people and, I dare say, within 10 years we will not recognize our country. Or we can stop this madness and embrace the original path of state’s rights with a small federal government and return the United States of America to its rightful place as a national leader on the world stage letting the individual states govern their people.
If we don’t, America risks becoming a stereotype of Europe: a place with good hospitals and millions of people without adequate medical care in a timely manner, lacking in technological leadership in many areas, and many people, at times, with limited access to world-class universities, and generations held back because of parochial worldviews.
We are, strangely, the first generation of citizens that doubt our own political project. A republic that is unique in the world and that still draws people from every country in the world to our shores. Our country still offers anyone, regardless of class or ethnicity, the opportunity to freely succeed in any entrepreneurial endeavor without governmental interference. It is the exceptionalism of the American people that is unique to the world that draws these people to our borders. We will lose this freedom in this generation if we do not stand up now!
There is an old Jewish saying, “If you have only two choices, then choose the third.” The point is not to replace America’s “go along to get along” style of leadership with a dictatorship of the young. The point is to focus this movement – it must be carried by all those who, regardless of their age, agree that we must shift more power to the rising youth as citizen-legislators so we can successfully reduce the debt and governmental burdens with which we are saddling our future generations.
These younger Americans have grown up in austerity, having to cut budgets and who are digital natives. Unlike our leaders today, they are well adapted to an increasingly rapid pace of change, and their instinct is to use the most innovative and cost-effective methods to achieve the goals of the American people.
In America, politics has become much too about individual personalities, careers and partisanship, and too little about what produces tangible results. Rather than bickering over whose federal policies are preferable, we need an “American” effort to determine our best practices in every field and adopt them principally to external objects, such as war, peace, negotiation and foreign commerce with taxation restricted to only these. Thus, in limiting the reach of the federal government into every citizen’s life, restores the liberties and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the state.
From the 50 laboratories mentioned earlier, we can determine, on a national level, which models offer the experience of which tested improvements to the human condition are successful, scalable and applicable to the national population. We have never allowed this to happen in our country’s existence. One recent idea, health care at a state level, was thought to be applicable at the national level without looking at its successes or failures, and without looking at whether the idea was scalable to the national level. We currently have an unworkable health care program that was never carefully thought out or debated to see which features were applicable or affordable. The rules are still being written and no one knows where our health care rules and regulations are going to take us. There is no accountability for these rules and regulations.
America will not be changed by the elections of 2014. It will only change when freedom-minded politicians who are elected to the federal legislature agree to transfer many of the powers the federal government has usurped back to the states, where they rightfully belong.
We need our politicians to know that we no longer buy their federal bluff, that we don’t share their fear of ‘we, the people don’t know what we’re doing.’ If we continue moving more toward the federal state, our current state legislatures and elected officials become irrelevant.
Either we harness the power of our people and our resources and change the direction of our political landscape to restore the greatest form of government the world has ever seen, or we let the pace of world government (United Nations) overtake our laws and rights leaving us without any right of self-government or personal rights or the right to own property.
The first step is to start voting not as Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Libertarians, Green Party, or whatever other political flavor of the day, but voting as “Americans” for our freedoms, our rights to own property, to choose our profession, to choose where we live, and to choose with whom we fellowship.
As one of my favorite commentator’s used to say, Wake Up America!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




